TINGKAT KREATIVITAS SLOW LEARNERS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA
Main Article Content
Abstract
The heterogeneity of students in Indonesia is a challenge for teachers today. Creativity is not only for students with high mathematical abilities, but also introduced to students who are in the slow learner category. This research is a qualitative descriptive study that aims to describe the level of creativity of the slow learner, and to describe how to develop creative thinking skills for slow learners. The subjects in this study from one of the schools in Yogyakarta whose students were included in the slow learner category. The subjects were selected by purposive sampling. Data collection had been done by giving problems solving to subjects, then interviewing them to clarify the answers that have been written. Data analysis had been stopped on the third subject because the data from the third subject was no difference with data from the previous subject. The results of this study indicate that slow learners are not able to show the three indicators of creativity in solving mathematical problems (fluency, flexibility, and novelty), so that the slow learners are classified as creative thinking skills level 0 or included in not creative students. Other findings indicate that one subject indicated being able to show one indicator of creativity, namely fluency, so that subject classified as level 1 (almost not creative).
Article Details
How to Cite
Cahdriyana, R. A., & Setyorini, R. (2019). TINGKAT KREATIVITAS SLOW LEARNERS DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol4no1.2019pp1-14
Section
Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
References
Ahmad, S.Z., & Mutalib, A.A. (2015). Exploring Computer Assisted Learning for Low Achieving Children: A Comparative Analysis Study. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(29).
Broadbent, J., & Poom, W.L. (2015). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievment in online Higher Education Learning Enviroments: A systematic Review. The Internet and Higer Education, 27, 1-13.
Cahdriyana, R.A. (2016). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta. AdMathEdu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ilmu Matematika dan Matematika Terapan. 6(2).
Cahdriyana, R.A., & Richardo, R. (2017). Karakteristik Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer untuk Siswa SMP. Alphamath, 2(2).
Chauhan, S. (2011). Slow Learners: Their Psycology and Educational Programmes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8),279-289.
Gharbaghi, A., Aris, B., Ahmad, M.H., & Rosli, M.S. (2013). Technological Persuasive Pedagogy: A new Way to Persuade Students in the Computer-Based Mathematics Learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14), 43-48.
Lichtinger, E., & Kaplan, A. (2015). Employing a Case Study Approach to Capture Motivation and Self-Regulation of Young Students with Learning Disabilities in Authentic Educational Contexts. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 119-149.
Maharani, H.R., & Sukestiyarno, S. (2017). Learning Analysisi Based on Humanism Theory and Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability of Students. Journal of Mathematics, 1(1).
Mumpuniarti, M. (2017). Challenges Faced by Teachers in Teaching Literacy and Numeracy for Slow Learners. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(3), 243.
Obradovic, S., Bjekic, D., & Zlatic, L. (2015). Creative Teaching with ICT Support for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 291-296.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Education Psychology – Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sinaga, B., Harahap, M., Sinambela, P.N., & Sinaga, L. (2016). The Development of Mathematics Instructional and Authentic Assessment Model Based on Curriculum 2013 to Improve the Attitude Quality, Creative Thinking Ability and Mathematics Connections of High School Students. Proceeding AISTEEL The First Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, 266-274.
Siswono, T.Y.E. (2011). Level of Student’s Creative Thinking in Classroom Mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548-553.
Turi, J.A., Ghani, M.F.A., Javid, Y., & Sorooshian, S. (2017). Teachers’s Instructional Strategies to Support Slow Learners in Selected Schools, The Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Online Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2).
Broadbent, J., & Poom, W.L. (2015). Self-Regulated Learning Strategies & Academic Achievment in online Higher Education Learning Enviroments: A systematic Review. The Internet and Higer Education, 27, 1-13.
Cahdriyana, R.A. (2016). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri 9 Yogyakarta. AdMathEdu. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Ilmu Matematika dan Matematika Terapan. 6(2).
Cahdriyana, R.A., & Richardo, R. (2017). Karakteristik Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Komputer untuk Siswa SMP. Alphamath, 2(2).
Chauhan, S. (2011). Slow Learners: Their Psycology and Educational Programmes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(8),279-289.
Gharbaghi, A., Aris, B., Ahmad, M.H., & Rosli, M.S. (2013). Technological Persuasive Pedagogy: A new Way to Persuade Students in the Computer-Based Mathematics Learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(14), 43-48.
Lichtinger, E., & Kaplan, A. (2015). Employing a Case Study Approach to Capture Motivation and Self-Regulation of Young Students with Learning Disabilities in Authentic Educational Contexts. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 119-149.
Maharani, H.R., & Sukestiyarno, S. (2017). Learning Analysisi Based on Humanism Theory and Mathematics Creative Thinking Ability of Students. Journal of Mathematics, 1(1).
Mumpuniarti, M. (2017). Challenges Faced by Teachers in Teaching Literacy and Numeracy for Slow Learners. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(3), 243.
Obradovic, S., Bjekic, D., & Zlatic, L. (2015). Creative Teaching with ICT Support for Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 291-296.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Education Psychology – Third Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sinaga, B., Harahap, M., Sinambela, P.N., & Sinaga, L. (2016). The Development of Mathematics Instructional and Authentic Assessment Model Based on Curriculum 2013 to Improve the Attitude Quality, Creative Thinking Ability and Mathematics Connections of High School Students. Proceeding AISTEEL The First Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, 266-274.
Siswono, T.Y.E. (2011). Level of Student’s Creative Thinking in Classroom Mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548-553.
Turi, J.A., Ghani, M.F.A., Javid, Y., & Sorooshian, S. (2017). Teachers’s Instructional Strategies to Support Slow Learners in Selected Schools, The Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Online Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2).