<div class="site-content container">
<div class="page">
<p>Some policies in the review of <strong>Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika </strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Any submitted paper will be reviewed by reviewers.</li>
<li class="show">Review process employs Double-blind Review, that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.</li>
<li class="show">In the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of title, abstract, discussion (findings) and conclusions. In addition, reviewers also consider the novelty, scientific impact and references used in the paper.</li>
</ol>
<p>The response of the reviewers will be the basis for the Editor to conclude:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Accept Submission</li>
<li class="show">Revisions Required</li>
<li class="show">Resubmit for review</li>
<li class="show">Resubmit elsewhere</li>
<li class="show">Decline Submission</li>
</ol>
<p>An article was rejected for publication due to various considerations, including:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">The article does not fit the scope of journal.</li>
<li class="show">The article does not follow the rules of writing scientific papers or author guidelines.</li>
<li class="show">The fundamental methodological errors.</li>
<li class="show">The author refuses to make suggestions of improvements provided by the reviewer without a logical basis.</li>
<li class="show">There are indications of plagiarism of more than 20%.</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>